Archive for fake drugs

U.S. Identifies Tainted Heparin in 11 Countries

In a recent article the Chinese government insisted they have the reciprocal right to inspect packaging operators in the USA as the USA insists we have the right to inspect the Chinese suppliers.

 

We can’t agree more with the Chinese.

 

Tainted Heparin is going to go down in US commerce history right next to Tylenol for J&J. The reason we have so much tainted Heparin is because drug producers are deflecting attention from ‘importers’ to ‘exporters.’

 

All the blame and attention is focused on the ‘exporter’ as though the US drug producers have no resources to properly inspect imports from China.

 

We strongly disagree.

 

The responsibility for ensuring the safety of drugs in the USA begins when the ocean container or the cargo flight lands on US soil… not when it exits at a foreign country.

 

US drug producers are 100% accountable for the ‘importation’ of contaminated Heparin.

 

Maybe if the drug producers spent less time and money trying to kill legislation to ensure the safety of the drug supply chain, there will be less people killed by inadequate inspections of imports by the drug producers ?

 

—————–
April 22, 2008

U.S. Identifies Tainted Heparin in 11 Countries

 

But a Chinese official disputed the assertion that the contaminant found in the drug, heparin, caused any deaths and insisted that his country’s inspectors be allowed to inspect the American plant where the finished heparin vials were made. He said any future agreement to allow American inspections of Chinese firms should be reciprocal.

“We don’t have a strong evidence to show that it is heparin or its contaminant that caused the problem,” said the official, Ning Chen, second secretary at the Chinese Embassy.

Mr. Chen said that illnesses associated with contaminated heparin had occurred only in the United States, which he said suggested that the problem arose in this country.

Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the Food and Drug Administration’s drug center, said that German regulators uncovered a cluster of illnesses among dialysis patients who took contaminated heparin. She said Chinese officials had conceded that heparin produced in their country contained a contaminant, though they say it was not connected to the illnesses.

“Heparin should not be contaminated, regardless of whether or not that contamination caused acute adverse events,” Dr. Woodcock said. “We are fairly confident based on the biological information that we have had that this contaminant is capable of triggering these adverse reactions.”

The dispute is a sign of growing tensions between China and the United States over the safety of Chinese imports. China has in recent years exported poisonous toothpaste, lead-painted toys, toxic pet food, tainted fish and now, contaminated medicine.

Bills to require far more aggressive inspections of Chinese products and companies are being proposed by members of Congress. Hearings are scheduled for Tuesday in the House and Thursday in the Senate.

China has lurched between defensiveness and cooperation on issues of product safety. Last year, it initially blocked the F.D.A. from investigating tainted pet food and accused foreign forces of exaggerating the issue. Then in July, China said that it had executed its former top food and drug regulator for taking bribes and promised reforms.

The F.D.A. sent a warning letter on Monday to Changzhou SPL, the Chinese plant identified as the source of contaminated heparin made by Baxter International in the United States. It warned that the plant used unclean tanks to make heparin, that it accepted raw materials from an unacceptable vendor and that it had no adequate way to remove impurities.

Heparin is made from the mucous membranes of the intestines of slaughtered pigs that, in China, are often cooked in unregulated family workshops. The contaminant, identified as oversulfated chondroitin sulfate, a cheaper substance, slipped through the usual testing and was recognized only after more sophisticated tests were used.

The F.D.A. has identified 12 Chinese companies that have supplied contaminated heparin to 11 countries — Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United States. Deborah Autor, director of compliance at the F.D.A.’s drug center, said the agency did not know the original source of all the contamination or the points in the supply chain at which it was added.

Officials have discovered heparin lots that included the cheap fake additive manufactured as early as early as 2006, although a spike in illnesses associated with contaminated heparin began in November and persisted through February, officials said.

Separately, the Government Accountability Office will release a report on Tuesday showing that the F.D.A. would need to spend at least $56 million more next year to begin full inspections of foreign plants. It would need to spend at least $15 million annually to inspect China’s drug plants every two years, which is the domestic standard.

Bush administration officials have acknowledged problems associated with poor inspection of overseas plants and have plans to improve the situation. But President Bush’s budget does not provide the F.D.A. with funds to hire more inspectors.

At its present inspection pace, the F.D.A. would need at least 27 years to inspect every foreign medical device plant that exports to the United States, 13 years to check every foreign drug plant and 1,900 years to examine every foreign food plant.

Proposals circulating on Capitol Hill would increase the agency’s financing and charge domestic and foreign manufacturers fees to pay for inspections.

“Even the Bush administration seems to understand the potential peril that these foreign firms pose, but they offer only vague plans to address the problems and they refuse to spend more than a fraction of the money needed to protect the public,” said Representative John D. Dingell, a Michigan Democrat who leads the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

The F.D.A. has announced plans to open inspection offices in three Chinese cities, but the agency has yet to get permission from the Chinese government. Mr. Chen said any inspection agreement should be reciprocal. “Will the U.S. government accept the Chinese F.D.A. to set up in the United States?” he said.

Dr. Woodcock said the Chinese had agreed to test heparin lots before allowing them to be exported. But Dr. Moheb Nasr, director of the drug agency’s office of new drug quality assessment, said that the Chinese test might not be sensitive enough to identify the contaminant.

Dr. Woodcock assured patients, however, that all heparin supplies in the United States had been tested with the most sensitive assays and had been found to be uncontaminated.

Scientific Protein Laboratories and Changzhou SPL said the company regretted the agency’s decision to send a warning letter that, it said, did not reflect the company’s current safety practices. The company said it had no way of detecting a contaminant present in heparin supplies throughout China.

Baxter International, which bought heparin ingredients from SPL and sold the finished drug in the United States, said that its tests confirmed that the contaminant could cause illness. It disputed the F.D.A.’s analysis that its product was linked with 81 deaths, saying it had identified only 5 in which its product “may have contributed to the adverse outcome, though there is not yet enough medical data available to draw a firm conclusion that the reaction caused the death.”

Deaths linked to the drug may have been concentrated in the United States because American doctors may be more likely to use large, quickly infused amounts of the drug, said drug officials. Also, the F.D.A. may track serious side effects better than its counterparts abroad.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/health/policy/22fda.html?hp

Leave a Comment

Heparin Is Now Suspected in 62 Fatalities Across U.S.

April 10, 2008

Heparin Is Now Suspected in 62 Fatalities Across U.S.

 

 

The number of suspicious deaths in the United States linked to the blood thinner heparin has risen to 62 from 19, with most of them reported this past December, January and February, according to the first detailed analyses of heparin fatalities by the Food and Drug Administration.

The F.D.A. is still investigating whether those deaths and hundreds of allergic reactions were caused by a heparinlike contaminant made in China that was added to the drug somewhere during the manufacturing process.

The drug agency defined suspicious deaths as those involving one or more allergic reactions or a drop in blood pressure. There have been no reports of deaths since the end of February, after Baxter International recalled heparin made with ingredients from a Chinese supplier.

The agency’s Web site reported Tuesday that the 62 deaths covered a 14-month period that began in January 2007. In comparison, the agency said, there were three suspicious deaths involving heparin in all of 2006.

The F.D.A. had earlier identified the contaminant as a chemically altered substance that slipped through standard testing screens because it mimicked heparin. The agency was able to spot the additive only by using a more sophisticated test.

Investigators have not yet established how or why the additive, called oversulfated chondroitin sulfate, ended up in heparin, though the fact that it is cheaper to make than the actual drug points to the possible involvement of counterfeiters.

In addition to Baxter, companies that have recalled heparin products made with Chinese ingredients include Covidien, formerly Tyco Healthcare, and B. Braun. Both Covidien and Braun said that they had received no reports of adverse reactions from the heparin and that the recalls had been undertaken merely as a precaution.

Similar recalls of the drug have occurred in Germany, Denmark, France, Italy and Japan.

Heparin is made from the mucous membranes in pig intestines. It is commonly used in dialysis and in many types of surgery.

Drug regulators in China, the world’s biggest supplier of heparin ingredients, have said they are tightening supervision over production of the drug, which involves thousands of small family workshops that gather and treat the raw material from pig intestines.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/health/policy/10heparin.html

Leave a Comment

Law & Order – NBC Episode on counterfeit asthma inhaler

Even producers of Law & Order appreciate the impact of counterfeit drugs.

A Park Avenue dentist is murdered and evidence points to his young patient. Wednesday, February 20, 2008 at 9PM. 

An episode of a series of murders related to counterfeit drugs. The fictitious Shore Labs drug producer that manufactures an asthma inhaler as well as a mouthwash, Snow-Mint, that are tainted with DEG.

The FDA inspector discovers the tainted mouthwash at a dollar store and reports to his FDA supervisor, Leslie Lezard.

The FDA Deputy Director, Atlantic Division, covers up the tainted mouthwash by conspiring with the drug producer to avoid recalls.

The FDA Deputy Director was a former drug lobbyist and college ‘buddy’ of the drug producer, Bing Shore.

3 children dead. 2 adults dead.

The only thing missing in the episode was a letter from Shore Labs to the California Board of Pharmacy requesting a delay to January 2011 for e-Pedigree compliance.

Leave a Comment

Johnson & Johnson tracks down maker of phony diabetes test ?

Thursday, August 16, 2007

NEW YORK: A global manhunt begun by Johnson & Johnson has traced to China counterfeit versions of an at-home diabetes test used by 10 million Americans to take sensitive measurements of blood sugar levels.Potentially dangerous copies of the OneTouch Test Strip sold by Johnson & Johnson’s LifeScan unit surfaced in U.S. and Canadian pharmacies last year, according to federal court documents unsealed in June but only recently discovered by Bloomberg News.

Court filings disclose, for the first time, that China is the source of about one million phony test strips, which have turned up in at least 35 states and in Canada, Greece, India, Pakistan, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

Johnson & Johnson, the world’s largest consumer-health products maker, learned of the counterfeit tests after 15 patients complained of faulty results last September.

Tipped off by Johnson & Johnson, which is based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a nationwide consumer alert in October without disclosing the link to China. While no injuries were reported, inaccurate test readings may lead a diabetic to inject the wrong amount of insulin, causing harm or death, the agency said.

Fake medicines are a $32 billion global business, said the World Health Organization, and the Food and Drug agency said it had run 54 counterfeit investigations in 2006, almost twice as many as in the year before.

“Growth in counterfeit medicines and devices is probably the biggest health threat besides infectious disease,” said Peter Pitts, director of the Center for Medicines in the Public Interest in New York and formerly an agency official investigating fake drugs.

“The source was from China, through Canada, to the United States,” said Steven Gutman, director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices and Evaluation at the agency in Rockville, Maryland, referring to the phony test strips. “As far as we can tell, the counterfeiter has been put out of business in the U.S.”

The court documents show, also for the first time, a worldwide distribution chain discovered in the past year by investigators hired by Johnson & Johnson. The trail, initiated by consumer complaints to a LifeScan hotline, first led detectives to 700 pharmacies where the products were sold, then to eight U.S. wholesalers and then to two importers, one in the United States, who was tracked down in a hotel room in Las Vegas, and another in Canada.

Records seized from the importers show the counterfeit strips were bought from Henry Fu and his company, Halson Pharmaceutical, which, according to its Internet site, is based in Shanghai.

Halson’s Web site says that the company distributes and manufactures medical supplies like syringes, and is run by Fu, who, according to a court order, is also known as Su Zhi Yong. Fu was arrested by the Chinese authorities and remains in prison in China, awaiting resolution of his case in the People’s Court of Shanghai.

LifeScan sells a variety of strips under the OneTouch Ultra and OneTouch Basic Profile names. The test sells in the United States without prescription for about $1 per strip.

Johnson & Johnson officials first learned that corrupted strips were being sold “between Sept. 18 and Sept. 28, 2006, when LifeScan received complaints from 15 customers from various states, including Wisconsin, New Jersey and New York, concerning the same lot,” Johnson & Johnson said in court papers.

On Oct. 5, investigators hired by LifeScan visited three pharmacies in Wisconsin and found OneTouch packages with a lot number not created by the company’s plants in Inverness, Scotland and Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, the papers say. On the same day, another investigator, following a call to LifeScan’s toll-free hotline, found a package with the same phony lot number in a Brooklyn, New York drugstore.

“The first box we found, in fact, had a unique lot number,” Potter said at a hearing held July 13 by Judge Sandra Townes at U.S. District Court in Brooklyn. “The counterfeiters counterfeited every element from the original box, except they put a fake lot number. They really did us a favor and we were able to advance this case quite rapidly because of that.”

On Oct. 13, the U.S. Food and Drug agency published its consumer alert and LifeScan issued a press release and notified pharmacists, distributors and wholesalers to watch for packages with four separate lot numbers.

Pharmacists told investigators they had bought the strips from wholesalers who, in turn, said they had purchased the product from Royal Global Wholesale, of Boynton Beach, Florida. That company is run by Jacques Duplessis from his home.

A Johnson & Johnson team raided the Duplessis Boynton Beach home and discovered he was vacationing in Las Vegas. A seizure order from a federal court allowed Johnson & Johnson to take possession of business records from his Las Vegas hotel room.

“My client is very distraught that he was distributing test strips that were alleged to be counterfeit,” said Steven Horowitz, an attorney for Duplessis.

The other importer from China, court documents show, is a Montreal company known as Zoe Diagnostics, owned by Alexander Vega. He worked for LifeScan for nine years and owns another Canadian company called Blue Sky World with Duplessis.

“Our clients reiterate their denial that they ever engaged in the sale of counterfeit product and expect that their position will eventually be vindicated before the courts,” said George Pollack, Vega’s attorney in Montreal.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/16/business/fake.php 

Johnson & Johnson tracks down maker of phony diabetes test

Leave a Comment

Panama Counterfeit Drug ’06 Poisoning kills 115

115 people were fatally poisoned by counterfeit drugs in Panama in 2006. If the same ratio of deaths was applied to the State of California it would translate to 1,226 deaths, 1,900 poisoned.

How did we derive 1,226 deaths ? We looked up the population of both Panama and California, below: 

Panama Population: 3,242,173 (July 2007 est.)
According to https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/pm.html
 

California Population, 2006 estimate 36,457,549  According to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html

Panamanian investigators have concluded that at least 174 people were poisoned, 115 of them fatally, by counterfeit cold medicine linked to an unlicensed Chinese chemical plant.

The report was the government’s first effort to offer a precise toll of those killed and disabled in the mass poisoning in 2006. But the head of the agency that prepared the report, Dr. José Vicente Pachar, said the number of victims was bound to be much higher because many in remote areas of the country were unlikely to report their cases to the government.

“The figures we have are the tip of the iceberg,” Dr. Pachar, director of the Institute of Legal Medicine of Panama’s Public Ministry, said in an interview. “We will never know the full extent.”

As if to underscore that point, a government agency that dispenses aid to victims found a higher number of poisoning victims: 184 so far, including 123 deaths. More than 700 claims have been filed on behalf of possible poisoning victims.

Dr. Pachar’s agency issued its report two weeks ago after investigating victims’ claims and exhuming more than 50 bodies. Previously, the government had estimated the death toll at 100.

The mass poisoning caused a political upheaval in Panama, partly because the government itself distributed the counterfeit medicine and because of questions over how vigorously the authorities sought to identify and help the victims. One protest last summer turned violent when the police began clubbing families of victims who were trying to deliver a list of complaints to Panama’s president.

The poisonings also brought new scrutiny to Chinese exports after The New York Times reported last May that a supposedly safe drug ingredient in the cold medicine actually contained diethylene glycol, an industrial solvent used in some antifreeze. What is more, it was made by a Chinese chemical company that did not have a license to sell drug ingredients.

China’s regulators initially said they had no legal grounds to take action against the manufacturer, but under rising international pressure the government closed the plant last year.

The families of some Panamanian victims have accused their government of trying to suppress the number of those harmed.

Gabriel Pascual, the leader of a group that represents victims and their families, criticized the government for ruling some cases inconclusive for poisoning without specifying the reasons.

Mr. Pascual cited seven examples of people he said had medical records certifying that they had ingested the poison, yet who government investigators concluded were unaffected or had inconclusive evidence. In 128 cases, the government said it lacked enough information to reach a definitive conclusion.

Mr. Pascual also criticized the slow pace of the exhumations.

The authorities said that they had exhumed 52 bodies, and that 27 had tested positive for diethylene glycol. Asked why more bodies had not been exhumed, Dr. Pachar said the tests were expensive, adding: “The institute’s budget is about $3 million for the whole year. The government spends almost $4 million on Carnival.”

Dr. Pachar — whose report is being used by prosecutors in criminal cases they have filed against 16 Panamanians involved in the handling and distribution of the toxic syrup — said it was impossible to identify all the possible victims. “People in the countryside who live far from the modern sectors of Panama tend to think of death as a matter of God’s will,” he said. “They tend not to report deaths that we might find suspicious.”

He said his investigation was 95 percent complete.

Elida de González, the chief social worker for the Victims’ Support Office, said her agency had confirmed a number of victims different from that of Dr. Pachar’s agency because the two investigated independently. Ms. González speculated that her agency’s count was higher because people were more willing to report their cases to an agency offering aid.

Mr. Pascual, the representative of the victims’ group, said he was injured in a demonstration on July 19, 2007, when the police used billy clubs to stop the group from presenting a petition listing its complaints to President Martín Torrijos. Mr. Pascual said one person was hospitalized and seven were treated and released.

Afterward, the government apologized. “It’s really sad and lamentable what happened,” President Torrijos said.

The poisonings occurred after a Chinese factory sold 46 barrels of toxic syrup to a Beijing broker, owned by China’s government. The mislabeled syrup then went through brokers in Barcelona and Panama before being sold to a Panamanian health service. It unwittingly mixed the diethylene glycol into 260,000 bottles of cold medicine.

No one in China has been prosecuted for selling the counterfeit syrup.

The same poison, diethylene glycol, was later detected in Chinese-made toothpaste sold in Panama, setting off a worldwide hunt for tainted toothpaste.

Comments (2)

Eli Lilly and Co. is gearing up to fight legislation that would allow Americans to import lower-priced prescription drugs

January 22, 2008
Lilly girds for drug import battle
Counterfeit fears mark U.S. debate over scripts’ cost

January 22, 2008

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080122/BUSINESS/801220335

 Eli Lilly and Co. is gearing up to fight legislation that would allow Americans to import lower-priced prescription drugs from other countries, saying it would put consumers at huge risk of dangerous counterfeit medicines, which it says is growing to epidemic proportions.

The Indianapolis company and other U.S. drug makers won a similar battle last year when the Senate killed a drive that would have allowed consumers, pharmacists, drug wholesalers and distributors to import drugs from Canada, Japan, Australia and many European countries.
But what the drug industry sees as a threat to patient safety and its intellectual property, some consumer groups say is a needed way to provide lower-cost drugs to Americans, who pay the highest prices in the world for prescription medicines. Supporters say the bill adequately protects the public against counterfeit drugs.
The bill has yet to be set for a vote, and both sides say it could come up with little notice.
As the cost of prescription drugs rise and health-care costs loom as a top issue in this year’s presidential election, the issue of affordability and accessibility are sure to resonate in Washington and around the country.
The stakes are high for drug makers. Many other countries keep drug prices low through government controls. But Americans wind up paying the higher market price for drugs, meaning they often pay two-thirds more than Canadians, 80 percent more than Germans and 100 percent more than French residents pay for identical prescription drugs.
“The issue of importation is a big fear for the entire pharmaceutical industry,” said Robert Hazlett, a drug analyst for BMO Capital Markets in New York. “It’s tough to put a dollar figure on what it could cost drug companies if importation legislation passed.”
Lilly, for its part, say price controls stifle innovation and reduce competition. Along with other drug makers, Lilly counts on higher prices paid by Americans to fund expensive research for new drugs.
The real issue, Lilly said, is the sharply rising epidemic of counterfeit drugs — fake, unregulated, illegal drugs made in Third World countries. Since January 2006, customs officials around the world have seized more than 3 million counterfeit or suspected counterfeit tablets, in more than 1,000 separate actions, the company said.
Lilly said counterfeit versions of six of its branded drugs have been seized around the world, including antipsychotic Zyprexa, erectile-dysfunction drug Cialis and antidepressant Cymbalta.

Wide span of fakes

According to the World Health Organization, just about every type of drug has been counterfeited, from antihistamines and erectile dysfunction drugs to medicines designed to treat serious diseases, such as cancer, malaria and AIDS.
The organization calls counterfeiting “an enormous public health challenge.” A woman in Argentina who had mild anemia died of liver failure in 2004 after taking a highly toxic counterfeit. A woman from Canada was fatally poisoned by fake drugs she received over the Internet laced with deadly metals.
Many of the drugs, the industry says, are made by organized criminals in unsanitary conditions that would never pass FDA approval. They can make huge profits without overhead costs, quality control or regulatory enforcement.
“They might run a batch of Viagra, then a batch of Cialis, then a batch of Lipitor, and then they might do some narcotics,” Michael J. Muller, director of Lilly’s global anti-counterfeiting operations. “These guys are after money, a quick buck.”
Lilly says the volume of global counterfeiting comes to about $30 billion, which would represent about 5 percent of global sales. The company expects the figure to double by 2010.
Only a tiny fraction of counterfeit drugs enter the U.S. market. But Lilly and other drug makers say they could widen to dangerous levels if Congress relaxes the federal ban on imported drugs.

High costs

Last year, Lilly sold its case by taking out newspaper advertisements, enlisting help from the powerful industry trade groups, and telling its story to more than 100 congressional staffers.
In the meantime, the company said it spends more than $1 million a day to fight drug counterfeiting around the world, beefing up its security, legal, anti-counterfeiting, quality control and other functions.
But advocates of drug importation say keeping the ban in place is more of a protection for the industry than a safety measure for consumers. They say U.S. regulators can protect consumer safety.
“The counterfeit argument is absolutely a red herring,” said Barry Piatt, press secretary to U.S. Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, D-N.D., who was the chief sponsor of last year’s measure. “What the drug companies don’t tell you is they themselves import medicines into this country from their plants overseas.”
Dorgan’s bill, he said, includes provisions that would allow the Food and Drug Administration to inspect warehouses of foreign exporters and domestic importers.

Consumer support

Many consumer groups support a bill to allow imports. Union Senior Action, an Indianapolis advocacy group that represents about 13,000 senior Hoosiers, said it has helped dozens of people travel to Windsor, Canada, to buy drugs.
“When you’re taking several medications a day, the savings can be substantial,” said Paul Severance, the group’s founder and retired executive director.
The AARP, the nation’s largest advocacy group for seniors, has steadily supported relaxing the ban on drug imports. The group points out that drug prices are rising at nearly twice the annual rate of inflation, taking a toll on consumers, private sector health insurance and state budgets.
“If Eli Lilly can have manufacturing facilities all over the world, and bring their product into the U.S. safely to sell here, why is it that similar safety provisions can’t be put in place to allow individuals to purchase drugs from abroad,” said Anna Howard, a senior legislative representative with the AARP.
But the Bush administration has said the worldwide drug market is so vast, it can’t guarantee the safety of imported medicines.
Lilly said that it offers several programs for needy consumers, including uninsured Americans, to obtain drugs. Medicare Part D, a federal program that subsidizes the cost of prescription drugs, has helped millions of seniors obtain cheaper drugs, the company said.

Comments (1)

Counterfeit Parallel Distributed Product Plavix Tablets 75 mg Film Coated Tablets May, 2007

Defective Medicines Report Centre
Market Towers
1 Nine Elms Lane
London
SW8 5NQ
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7084 2574 Fax: +44 (0)20 7084 2676

MHRA Distribution: Regional Contacts for NHS Trusts and Provider Units Chief Pharmacists: England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland Prison Health Policy Unit (DH) Chief Pharmacists: Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Isle of Man, Gibraltar Special Hospitals Healthcare Commission for distribution to Independent Health Care Establishments Primary Care Trusts (England)

D R U G A L E R T CLASS 1 MEDICINES RECALL

Action Now – including out of hours

PHARMACY LEVEL RECALL
Date: 25 May 2007
EL(07)A/07
Our Ref: MDR 36-05/07
_________________________________________________________________________

Dear Healthcare Professional,

Counterfeit Parallel Distributed Product Plavix Tablets 75 mg Film Coated Tablets EU/1/98/069/001a – 007b (Clopidogrel)

The MHRA in conjunction with the EMEA, with assistance from sanofi – aventis and Bristol Myers Squibb, are recalling any parallel distributed stock of Lots 3098 and 6Y098 (and lot variants) of Clopidogrel tablets 75 mg branded as Plavix following the discovery of counterfeit tablets in the legitimate supply chain. Please read the comments below about lot number variants used in the parallel distribution trade.

This counterfeit material was supplied in French livery via parallel distributors into the UK supply chain. Counterfeit product may be present in the UK supply chain alongside genuine manufactured product. Stock presenting a patient risk may be present as French livery cartons with an overlabel applied by a parallel distributor or may have been recartoned into an English carton by the parallel distribution repacking process.
The above lots are genuine sanofi – aventis and Bristol Myers Squibb lot numbers for which the original unchanged lots were supplied to France in French livery.

Please note that sanofi – aventis and Bristol Myers Squibb routinely supply stock to the UK market which is not parallel distributed and is in UK branded livery. This stock is not affected. None of this stock has the above lot numbers or variants.

We have limited information about this problem and understand the EMEA has allowed in excess of 30 UK parallel distributors to supply this product.

Waymade plc have added a suffix to the batch number, such as 3103/1 to differentiate different packing runs.
Actions Required Recipients are requested to quarantine the above batch lot numbers and return to Waymade plc, Miles Gray Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3FR for examination and we suggest you keep full details of any returns.

During normal working hours, please telephone Waymade Customer Services on 01268 535200, to make arrangements for return.

The issue of reimbursement should be discussed with Waymade plc. Additional information is available in the Q&As sheet attached. Primary Care Trusts are asked to bring this information to the attention of Community
Pharmacists, GPs and professionals with an interest in cardiovascular medicine by copy of this letter.

Yours faithfully

Ian Holloway
MHRA DMRC Manager

Q&As
Why has a Class 1 Drug Alert been issued in this case?
Initial tests show that samples only contain about 70 – 80% of the labelled active ingredient. In addition, a counterfeit is likely to show a different bioavailability profile and may contain harmful degradants. Work is ongoing to obtain more information but in the interim we consider a recall is needed to minimise patient risk.

Is batch 3103 from any other supplier implicated?

We are not aware of any other suspect parallel distributed material with this batch number. If you have concerns about material from another parallel distributor please contact the parallel distributor listed on the pack.

Why does the licence number have a suffix e.g. “a”?
This indicates that the product should be packaged in PVC blisters.

What is the difference between parallel distribution and parallel imports?
Parallel traded products are often sold at lower prices in the EU and are allowed to be imported and relabelled for sale in the UK. Parallel distributed products have a marketing authorisation issued by the EMEA and parallel imported products have a marketing authorisation issued by the MHRA.

In both cases the repacking and relabelling are inspected by the MHRA but the importation and/or distribution takes place outside the original manufacturer’s supply chain.

http://www.buysafedrugs.info/Reports/recall_plavix_alert1.htm

Leave a Comment

The answer to poor enforcement ? Scare the consumer

Parallel trade pushing fakes?

http://www.packwire.com/news/ng.asp?n=76918-eli-lilly-sanofi-aventis-parallel-import-counterfeit-drugs-zyprexa
29/05/2007- Batches of two fake blockbuster drugs are being recalled after counterfeits made their way into the UK supply chain via parallel distribution, adding fuel to the debate on the security of the practice in the EU.Three batches of Zyprexa (olanzapine), Eli Lilly’s market-leading antipsychotic drug, are being recalled after a repackager of the Zyprexa batches grew suspicious and informed Eli Lilly.Ongoing investigations of the Zyprexa counterfeiting by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) led to the recall of two lots of blood clot-reducing Plavix (clopidogrel) from Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol Myers Squibb.The counterfeiting of both drugs is thought to be related.

According to an MHRA spokesperson, fake Zyprexa and Plavix are the first counterfeit drugs in 10 years to enter the UK supply chain via parallel imports. But despite this rarity, the pharmaceutical industry has often argued that parallel importing could pave the way to a black market in counterfeit drugs.

Parallel trading is not illegal in the EU, and involves medicines being imported from countries where they are cheaper, to be resold and distributed outside the distribution network that the manufacturers or original suppliers have.

For Zyprexa and Plavix, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has approved more than 30 UK parallel distributors to supply each product separately.

In both cases, the counterfeit material was supplied in French livery via parallel distributors into the UK supply chain and may be present alongside the genuine manufactured product, the MHRA announced in a statement.

The bootleg Zyprexa contains approximately 60 per cent of the labelled active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), while Plavix contains between 70 and 80 per cent.

While fake Zyprexa reached patients, the MHRA was not aware at this stage how widespread the Plavix tablets were in the supply chain, but was recalling them as a “precautionary move”.

One person in relation to the incident has been arrested and is on bail but has not yet been charged.

The MHRA spokesperson told in-PharmaTechnologist.com the agency had made several raids and seized documents but was unable to disclose any information on how the counterfeits got into the parallel distributed supply chain. It is believed the drugs were probably manufactured in either China, India or Pakistan.

Despite the obvious breach in the process of parallel distribution, the MHRA maintained it was “statistically incorrect” to say parallel imports increased the chances of counterfeit drugs making their way into the supply chain.

In 10 years, this was only the seventh time counterfeits had made their way into the UK supply chain and this was the first time via parallel importing, the MHRA spokesperson said.  

“There is a risk but we keep an eye on things. This is only one example,” she said.

Heinz Kobalt, secretary general of the European Association of Euro-Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC), the representative voice of pharmaceutical parallel distribution in Europe, agreed.

“It’s too early to draw full conclusions . . . It must be an element of poor checks or oversight or not enough vigilance. It is not a systematic error of parallel trade. It is a one-time incident and I hope it remains a one-time incident,” he told in-PharmaTechnologist.com.

Kobalt maintained that despite the cases there was still no argument to say parallel trade in pharmaceuticals needed to end: “The incidence of car accidents doesn’t lead to prohibiting cars,” he said.

According to the EAEPC website, “parallel trade is extremely safe”.

“Exporters and importers both apply internal supply chain controls and must meet stringent external regulatory checks to guarantee patient safety.”

It continues: “parallel distributors actually help to add a layer of safety to the distribution chain, often finding defect products”.

In the Zyprexa case this is exactly what happened – Eli Lilly was informed by a company which printed labelling for its products, after a repackager became suspicious and contacted them.

But the world’s largest drug-maker Pfizer has more than once spoken out against parallel trade in the pharmaceutical industry. Earlier this month, the drug giant attacked the practice during the First European Parliamentary symposium on pharmaceuticals and made reference to the 2006 recall of 120,000 packs of Lipitor (atorvastatin), accusing “middlemen companies” of their part in having counterfeits infiltrating the supply chain. This claim has been refuted by the EAEPC.

Eli Lilly and Sanofi-Aventis were unavailable for comment at time of press.

The batches being recalled are A229505, A200127 and A216454 for Zyprexa and Lots 3098 and 6Y098 for Plavix.

The counterfeit drug business is estimated to grow 13 per cent a year to reach $75bn (€56bn) in 2010, according to market research analysts Gartner and Frost & Sullivan.

Leave a Comment

Fact 10 – Counterfeit Drug liabilities

The US has seen the first court case brought against two drug companies for allegedly failing to act to protect customers over a fake drug discovery.

In 2002, a Kansas City pharmacist was jailed for diluting the anticancer drugs Gemzar (gemcitabine) and Taxol (paclitaxel).

The victims and dead patients’ families sued the drug companies, Eli Lilly and Myers Squibb, for not taking steps to stop him.

The companies argued that they had no duty to protect the plaintiffs from the pharmacist’s criminal acts, but a newspaper reported that Eli Lilly and Myers Squibb (BMS) settled out of court, apparently for US$72 million, avoiding a legal precedent that would hold drug companies liable for not disseminating such information.

Is this a concern in California for drug companies ?

Leave a Comment

Fact 9 – Lilly spends $1 million a day to combat counterfeit drugs

In a January 2008 article in the Indianapolis Star, Lilly spokesman stated that Lilly spends $1 million a day to combat counterfeit drugs.

 Lilly said counterfeit versions of six of its branded drugs have been seized around the world, including antipsychotic Zyprexa, erectile-dysfunction drug Cialis and antidepressant Cymbalta.

 The real issue, Lilly said, is the sharply rising epidemic of counterfeit drugs — fake, unregulated, illegal drugs made in Third World countries. Since January 2006, customs officials around the world have seized more than 3 million counterfeit or suspected counterfeit tablets, in more than 1,000 separate actions, the company said.

A woman in Argentina who had mild anemia died of liver failure in 2004 after taking a highly toxic counterfeit. A woman from Canada was fatally poisoned by fake drugs she received over the Internet laced with deadly metals.

Many of the drugs, the industry says, are made by organized criminals in unsanitary conditions that would never pass FDA approval. They can make huge profits without overhead costs, quality control or regulatory enforcement.
“They might run a batch of Viagra, then a batch of Cialis, then a batch of Lipitor, and then they might do some narcotics,” Michael J. Muller, director of Lilly’s global anti-counterfeiting operations. “These guys are after money, a quick buck.”
Lilly says the volume of global counterfeiting comes to about $30 billion, which would represent about 5 percent of global sales. The company expects the figure to double by 2010.

Comments (3)

Older Posts »